Ongoing effort to utilize genotyping in cotton breeding advancements
Writer: Kay Ledbetter, 806-677-5608, skledbetter@ag.tamu.edu
Contact: Dr. Wayne Smith, 979-845-3450, cwsmith@tamu.edu
COLLEGE STATION – Texas A&M University soil and crop sciences department and Texas A&M AgriLife Research are looking at using molecular tools as a solution to the world cotton market’s demand for longer, stronger fibers for spinning and weaving.
Texas A&M AgriLife Research scientists are using molecular tools to find stronger, longer fibers in cotton for spinning and weaving. (Texas A&M Ag Communications photo by Dr. Wayne Smith)
Dr. Wayne Smith, associate soil and crops sciences department head in College Station, and his graduate student Kari Hugie, said their ongoing project may not be seeing big dividends right now, but could be pavingthe way for the future.
Smith said upland cotton accounts for the majority of cotton fiber production worldwide. The global market places value on longer and stronger fibers, mandating U.S. breeders develop cultivars to meet this demand and remain competitive with man-made fibers.
One challenge breeders face concerning the improvement of fiber quality traits is low genetic diversity among elite, agronomically acceptable genotypes of upland cotton. The use of DNA marker-assisted selection could help breeders access unexploited genetic diversity as well as facilitate the simultaneous improvement of both yield and fiber quality traits, he said.
Recent quantitative trait loci, or QTL, mapping studies have led to the discovery of hundreds of QTL for fiber length and strength, and many of them show promise for use in marker-assisted selection, Smith said.
However, there are few reports of public programs utilizing marker-assisted selection for the improvement of fiber quality traits, he said. In general, there has been inconsistency among QTL discovered across studies and the QTL discovered generally are considered specific to the mapping populations in which they were discovered. Both are major obstacles preventing the use of marker-assisted selection for fiber quality.
Smith, along with Hugie, a Cotton Incorporated Fellow and doctoral student, began the project, “Identification of Robust Microsatellite Markers for Fiber Quality in Gossypium hirsutum,” to determine which of the publically available markers can be used in marker-assisted improvement of fiber quality in his program.
“The U.S. exports most of its cotton, because companies find it more economical to export our fiber, process it in other countries, and then import the finished textiles back into the U.S.,” Hugie said. “Thus, the U.S. now competes with raw cotton production globally, and improved fiber length will help our producers compete in this global marketplace.”
Hugie said in her research, she was looking for segments of DNA on cotton chromosomes related to fiber length and strength.
“We were looking for landmarks, or DNA markers, on chromosomes that we could use to identify these traits,” she said. “Instead of harvesting the cotton and sending fibers to a lab for fiber quality analysis to get information on length and strength, maybe we could just obtain the DNA and harvest only desirable plants without having to harvest the undesirable plants and thus save labor cost and improve breeding efficiency.
“What we found were DNA markers that are stably associated with fiber quality traits across diverse genetic backgrounds in the breeding program, but individually they really don’t increase length or strength tremendously,” Hugie said.
“But, research continues at Texas A&M with Dr. Hongbin Zhang and others to identify multiple QTL that together could provide selection techniques giving major improvements,” Smith said.
Zhang is professor of plant genomics and systems biology and director of the Laboratory for Plant Genomics and Molecular Genetics in College Station.
The study screened a total of 223 publically available DNA markers. Of that number, 55 markers were significantly associated with fiber length and 50 markers were significantly associated with fiber strength. Those numbers were narrowed down to subsets of three or four markers, which were then used in the selection of progeny rows across three different populations in the breeding program, Hugie said.
There was a significant difference in the mean fiber length and fiber strength between marker selected and non-selected progeny rows, she said. They also observed a differential response to marker-assisted selection across the three populations, which most likely is attributable to genetic background effects.
Still, Hugie said, the results demonstrate that the identified markers for fiber length and strength are reasonably stable across diverse genetic backgrounds.
“Our results suggest that the current, publicly available markers for fiber quality QTL are not yet a cost-effective alternative to field-based selection for the improvement of fiber quality considering the minor increase in trait means observed and the small amount of variation in length and strength accounted for by the markers,” Smith said.
“As genotyping costs continue to decrease relative to phenotyping costs, molecular breeding approaches that better capture phenotypic variation across different genetic backgrounds, such as mapping-as-you-go and genomic selection, may prove to be more efficient and cost effective methods for the improvement of fiber quality in cotton,” he said.
-30-
